Publications

Go back to Resources

Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in pediatric liver transplantation: A comparison of strategies across the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) consortium

05/2025

Journal Article

Authors:
Knackstedt, E. D.; Anderson, S. G.; Anand, R.; Mitchell, J.; Arnon, R.; Book, L.; Ekong, U.; Elisofon, S. A.; Furuya, K. N.; Himes, R.; Jain, A. K.; Ovchinsky, N.; Sundaram, S. S.; Bucuvalas, J.; Danziger-Isakov, L.; Society of Pediatric Liver, Transplantation

Volume:
25

Pagination:
1098-1106

Issue:
5

Journal:
Am J Transplant

PMID:
39368657

URL:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39368657

DOI:
10.1016/j.ajt.2024.09.025

Keywords:
Humans *Liver Transplantation/adverse effects *Cytomegalovirus Infections/prevention & control/etiology/virology Child Female Male Prospective Studies *Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use Child, Preschool *Cytomegalovirus/isolation & purification Adolescent Follow-Up Studies Infant *Postoperative Complications/prevention & control Registries Graft Survival Prognosis Risk Factors *Graft Rejection/prevention & control/etiology cytomegalovirus pediatric liver transplantation prophylaxis

Abstract:
Although cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common complication after pediatric liver transplantation (PLT), the optimal method for CMV prevention is uncertain and lacks multicentered investigation. We compared the effectiveness of short (<120 days) vs long (>180 days) CMV primary antiviral prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease in PLT, through a prospective cohort study of primary PLT (aged <18 years) recipients enrolled in the Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation registry from 2015 to 2019 with either donor or recipient CMV seropositivity. Participants were grouped into short or long prophylaxis based on their center's practice and intended duration. In total, 199 PLT recipients were enrolled including 112 (56.3%) short and 87 (43.7%) long prophylaxis. End-organ disease was rare and similar between groups (2.7% and 1.1%; P = .45). CMV DNAemia and syndrome were more common in the short compared with those in long prophylaxis (26.8% vs 13.8%; P = .03; 18.8% vs 6.9%; P = .02). Neutropenia occurred more commonly with long prophylaxis (55.2% vs 16.1%; P < .001). Graft and patient survival were similar. Consideration of a short prophylaxis must weigh increased risk of CMV syndrome/DNAemia against medication burden and neutropenia of longer prophylaxis.

Go back to Resources