Publications

Submitted by ctuttle on
Go back to Resources

Population pharmacokinetics and target attainment analyses to identify a rational empirical dosing strategy for cefepime in critically ill patients.

2023 Jun 01

Journal Article

Authors:

An, G.
Creech, B.
Wu, N.
Nation, R.L.
Gu, K.
Nalbant, D.
Jimenez-Truque, N.
Fissell, W.
Patel, P.C.
Fishbane, N.
Watanabe, A.
Rolsma, S.
Kirkpatrick, C.M.J.
Landersdorfer, C.B.
Winokur, P.

Secondary:
J Antimicrob Chemother

Volume:
78

Pagination:
1460-1470

Issue:
6

PMID:
37071586

URL:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37071586/

DOI:
10.1093/jac/dkad106

Keywords:
Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefepime; Chromatography, Liquid; Critical Illness; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Monte Carlo Method; Prospective Studies; Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Abstract:
<p>OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify rational empirical dosing strategies for cefepime treatment in critically ill patients by utilizing population pharmacokinetics and target attainment analysis.PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective and opportunistic pharmacokinetic (PK) study was conducted in 130 critically ill patients in two ICU sites. The plasma concentrations of cefepime were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method. All cefepime PK data were analysed simultaneously using the non-linear mixed-effects modelling approach. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate the PTA of cefepime at different MIC values following different dose regimens in subjects with different renal functions.RESULTS: The PK of cefepime in critically ill patients was best characterized by a two-compartment model with zero-order input and first-order elimination. Creatinine clearance and body weight were identified to be significant covariates. Our simulation results showed that prolonged 3 h infusion does not provide significant improvement on target attainment compared with the traditional intermittent 0.5 h infusion. In contrast, for a given daily dose continuous infusion provided much higher breakpoint coverage than either 0.5 h or 3 h intermittent infusions. To balance the target attainment and potential neurotoxicity, cefepime 3 g/day continuous infusion appears to be a better dosing regimen than 6 g/day continuous infusion.CONCLUSIONS: Continuous infusion may represent a promising strategy for cefepime treatment in critically ill patients. With the availability of institution- and/or unit-specific cefepime susceptibility patterns as well as individual patients&#039; renal function, our PTA results may represent useful references for physicians to make dosing decisions.</p>

Go back to Resources