Publications

Submitted by ctuttle on
Go back to Resources

Early-Phase Clinical Trials in the Community: Results from the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program Early-Phase Working Group Baseline Assessment

Mar-13

Journal Article

Authors:

Zaren, H.A.
Nair, S.
Go, R.S.
Enos, R.A.
Lanier, K.S.
Thompson, M.A.
Zhao, J.
Fleming, D.L.
Leighton, J.C.
Gribbin, T.E.
Bryant, D.M.
Carrigan, A.
Corpening, J.C.
Csapo, K.A.
Dimond, E.P.
Ellison, C.
Gonzalez, M.M.
Harr, J.L.
Wilkinson, K.
Denicoff, A.M.

Secondary:
J Oncol Pract

Volume:
9

Pagination:
e55-e61

URL:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23814525

Abstract:
<p>PURPOSE: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Community Cancer Centers Program (NCCCP) formed an Early-Phase Working Group to facilitate site participation in early-phase (EP) trials. The Working Group conducted a baseline assessment (BA) to describe the sites&#039; EP trial infrastructure and its association with accrual. METHODS: EP accrual and infrastructure data for the sites were obtained for July 2010-June 2011 and 2010, respectively. Sites with EP accrual rates at or above the median were considered high-accruing sites. Analyses were performed to identify site characteristics associated with higher accrual onto EP trials. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of the 30 NCCCP sites participated. The median number of EP trials open per site over the course of July 2010-June 2011 was 19. Median EP accrual per site was 14 patients in 1 year. Approximately half of the EP trials were Cooperative Group; most were phase II. Except for having a higher number of EP trials open (P = .04), high-accruing sites (n = 14) did not differ significantly from low-accruing sites (n = 13) in terms of any single site characteristic. High-accruing sites did have shorter institutional review board (IRB) turnaround time by 20 days, and were almost three times as likely to be a lead Community Clinical Oncology Program site (small sample size may have prevented statistical significance). Most sites had at least basic EP trial infrastructure. CONCLUSION: Community cancer centers are capable of conducting EP trials. Infrastructure and collaborations are critical components of success. This assessment provides useful information for implementing EP trials in the community.</p>

Go back to Resources